Mark Levin 02/28/07
QUOTE: Talking about the Media doing in Senator George Allen
"..And they ran the commercials time and time again. Over and over again so morons in the state of Virginia would actually believe that George Allen, a man they knew as a State Representative, a Congressman, a Governor, and a Senator - so they would think he is corrupt. Newspapers including the Washington ComPost, the Virginia Pilot in Norfolk, and the Richmond Times Dispatch also editorialized about the matter. I go through this for two reasons. The man was smeared and slandered. And somebody needs to speak up for him. But I also want to show you how the Democrats and their media friends go about destroying Conservatives. Or trying to anyway. It was a phony issue from day one. They worked it through the campaign. They pretended he was unethical. They pretended he should have reported. They pretended that he violated some rule. And then quietly Barbara Boxer issues a letter - Oh, he didn't have to report that stuff. That happened BEFORE he became a Senator. You didn't do anything wrong Ex-Senator Allen. Oops! Sorry!"
COMMENT:
Mark this one example of the power of the media should be enough to cause you to lead your listeners into taking their country back from the media. As late as last Summer we all thought George Allen was going to be our candidate in 2008. This Enemy Within had the power within local news media outlets to take him down. How can you go on to other subjects? Our number one man was picked off by a treasonous Enemy Within. You don't lead your listeners to take their country back and now we are depressed that we have no Conservatives running? What sense does this make Mark? Are we going to just go on to the next problem while the ALL POWERFUL AND CORRUPT Media systematically eliminates whoever the hell they want to?
Mark, please use your free-market intelligence and think about this logic. If the three newspapers you mentioned were not supported by advertisements - if they were just a couple or few webs of news and no advertisements. There only method of increasing revenue would be to provide accurate, useful, non-biased, and non-subjective news. Pulling the kind of stunt that they pulled on Senator Allen would literally put them out of business. Mark, the truth sells, lies will not sell. We must cause a systemic change in the way information / news is delivered. These newspapers should be a couple of webs full of only pertinent information and cost a buck or two instead of a quarter because they are loaded with advertisements. We either subsidize propaganda that will destroy our Constitution or we put these bastards in a true free-market system where they will have to compete with every other business that is aiming for our discretionary dollars.
Mark, it's the same concept of why we all left the mainstream media and went to Limbaugh. To get the truth. The same simple supply & demand theory applies here, if one newspaper lies - the one that tells the truth will take all the business - just like it is suppose to be in a true free-market system.
I know what you are thinking Mark. Yes, you too should be unsponsored. Your program should be in a pay per consumption system as well. If all our News / Information / Entertainment were in true free-market delivery systems versus the communist economic systems they're currently in - we wouldn't have liberals in office, we would have already wiped out terrorism, and our trend towards more and more societal decadence would now be reversed.
Mark WE WONT PAY FOR THE GARBAGE WE NOW CONSUME FREE - OR CONSUME AT A SUPER SUBSIDIZED RATE!!!
